SEC Filing | Travere Therapeutics, Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_______________

FORM 10-Q/A

(Amendment No. 1)

_______________

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

RETROPHIN, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware	000-53293	27-4842691
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Commission File No.)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

777 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 100017

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

_______________

(646) 837-5863

(Issuer Telephone number)

_______________

(Former Name or Former Address if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.


Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The number of shares of outstanding common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Registrant as of September 13, 2013 was 18,150,837.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A (this “Amendment”) amends our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 24, 2013 (the “Original Filing”), solely for the purpose of amending Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements and Part I, Item 2. Management's Dicussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to include a footnote to our financial statements and disclosure relating to events that occurred after the conclusion of the period covered by the Original Filing. The Company also made an accounting adjustment related to the allocation of proceeds it received in a financing transaction it completed in February 2013. The adjustment affects the Company’s March 31, 2013 condensed consolidated balance sheet and condensed consolidated statement of stockholders' deficit. This Amendment is not intended to update any other information presented in the Original Filing. The Original Filing continues to speak as of the dates described therein, and we have not updated the disclosures contained therein to reflect any events that occurred subsequent to such dates. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the Original Filing, as information in such filings may update or supersede certain information contained in the Original Filing and in this Amendment.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013	6
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013	7
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
	Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 6. Exhibits	23

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

RETROPHIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31, 2013 (Restated)			December 31, 2012
	(unaudited)

Assets

Current assets:
Cash	$	2,503,463		$	11,388
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		134,457			21,830
Total current assets		2,637,920			33,218

Property and equipment, net		28,419			23,790
Patents pending		18,093			18,093
Due from affiliate		137,547			137,547
Technology license, net		2,128,662			2,178,617
Total assets	$	4,950,641		$	2,391,265

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

Current liabilities:
Technology license liability	$	-		$	1,300,000
Accounts payable		484,719			1,023,320
Accrued expenses		720,330			2,467,796
Registration payment obligation		360,000			-
Note payable - related party		-			884,764
Investors' deposits		-			100,000
Due to related parties		10,000			23,200

Total current liabilities		1,575,049			5,799,080

Derivative financial instruments, at estimated fair value - warrants		6,957,264			-

Total liabilities		8,532,313			5,799,080

Stockholders' Deficit:
Preferred stock Series A $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 0 issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 12,190,640 and 8,952,905 issued and outstanding, respectively		1,219			895
Additional paid-in capital		34,772,143			30,203,402
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(38,355,034	)		(33,612,112	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(3,581,672	)		(3,407,815	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	4,950,641		$	2,391,265

RETROPHIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

							For the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013
	For the three months ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Operating expenses:
Compensation and related costs - inclusive of share base compensation $20,833, $1,535,267 and $17,758,650	$	1,045,287		$	1,769,831		$	21,406,040
Professional fees - inclusive of share based compensation $138,372, $1,003,124, and $6,790,076		692,577			1,708,429			10,796,429
Selling, general and administrative		412,620			80,194			1,768,728
Technology license contingent fee		100,000			-			1,800,000
Total operating expenses		2,250,484			3,558,454			35,771,197

Operating loss		(2,250,484	)		(3,558,454	)		(35,771,197	)

Other income (expense):
Interest income		-			3,748			21,905
Interest expense		(41,563	)		(17,327	)		(147,480	)
Change in estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments - warrants		(2,451,659	)		-			(2,451,659	)
Gain (loss) on transactions denominated in foreign currencies		784			-			(6,603	)
Total other expense, net		(2,492,438	)		(13,579	)		(2,583,837	)

Net loss	$	(4,742,922	)	$	(3,572,033	)	$	(38,355,034	)

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.44	)	$	(1.43	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		10,697,129			2,502,327

RETROPHIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

	Common stock						Additional			Receivables due			Accumulated			Total Stockholders'
	Shares			Amount			paid in capital			from stockholder			deficit			deficit

Balance - March 11, 2011 (inception)		-		$	-		$	-		$			$	-		$	-
Issuance of common shares		1,608,300			161			24,839			(25,000	)		-			-
Issuance of common shares to founders inconnection with the initial capital contribution		50,000			5			95						-			100
Incentive shares granted- employees		1,758,300			176			(176	)		-			-			-
Incentive shares granted- non employees		381,000			38			(38	)		-			-			-
Incentive shares forfeited - employees		(45,835	)		(5	)		5			-			-			-
Share based compensation - employees		-			-			1,724,967			-			-			1,724,967
Share based compensation - non employees		-			-			254,332			-			-			254,332
Issuance of shares in connection with March 2011 private placement, net of fess of $66,061		253,750			25			658,914			-			-			658,939
Issuance of Series A preferred in connection with March 2011 private placement, net of feees of $1,367, recapitalization to common stock		36,750			4			103,629			-			-			103,633
Loan made to stockholder		-			-			-			(10,000	)		-			(10,000	)
Net loss		-			-			-			-			(3,268,256	)		(3,268,256	)
Balance - December 31, 2011		4,042,265			404			2,766,567			(35,000	)		(3,268,256	)		(536,285	)

Prior Issuance of Series A preferred in connection with January 2012 private placement, net of feees of $61,677, exchanged to common stock		326,963			33			1,806,644			-			-			1,806,677
Prior Issuance of Series A preferred in connection with May 2012 private placement, net of feees of $12,275, exchanged to common stock		470,764			47			1,668,979			-			-			1,669,026
Shares transferred to consultants by founder for services		-			-			4,400,000			-			-			4,400,000
Shares transferred to employees by founders for services		-			-			1,375,000									1,375,000
Shares issued in accordance with license agreement		620,000			62			1,549,938			-			-			1,550,000
Shares outstanding at time of reverse merger date December 12, 2012		2,585,583			259			1,142			-			-			1,401
Incentive shares granted- employees		866,180			86			(86	)		-			-			-
Incentive shares granted - non employees		87,503			9			(9	)		-			-			-
Incentive shares forfeited - employees		(46,353	)		(5	)		5			-			-			-
Share based compensation - employees		-			-			14,637,850			-			-			14,637,850
Share based compensation - non employees		-			-			1,997,372			-			-			1,997,372
Receivable due from stockholder charged to compensation		-			-			-			407,900			-			407,900
Loan made to stockholder		-			-			-			(372,900	)		-			(372,900	)
Net loss		-			-			-			-			(30,343,856	)		(30,343,856	)
Balance - December 31, 2012		8,952,905			895			30,203,402			-			(33,612,112	)		(3,407,815	)

Incentive shares granted - non employees		12,500			1			(1	)		-			-			-
Share based compensation - employees (unaudited)		-			-			20,833			-			-			20,833
Share based compensation - non employees (unaudited)		-			-			138,372			-			-			138,372
Incentive shares forfeited - employees (unaudited)		(20,833	)		(2	)		2			-			-			-
Incentive shares forfeited - non employees (unaudited)		(72,082	)		(7	)		7			-			-			-
Issuance of common stock in connection with January 2013 private placement at $3.00 per share, net of fees of $0 (unaudited)		272,221			27			816,637			-			-			816,664
Issuance of common stock in connection with February 2013 private placement at $3.00 per share, net of fees of $678,986 and registration payment obligation of $360,000 (unaudited)		3,045,929			305			3,592,891			-			-			3,593,196
Net loss (unaudited)		-			-			-			-			(4,742,922	)		(4,742,922	)
Balance - March 31, 2013-Restated (unaudited)		12,190,640		$	1,219		$	34,772,143		$	-		$	(38,355,034	)	$	(3,581,672	)

RETROPHIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

							For the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013
	For the three months ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(4,742,922	)	$	(3,572,033	)	$	(38,355,034	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		52,168			313			177,408
Compensation in lieu of receivable		-			-			407,900
Share based compensation - employees		20,833			1,535,267			17,758,650
Share based compensation - non-employees		138,372			1,003,124			6,790,076
Share based payment - Technology license contingent fee		-			-			1,550,000
Change in estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments - warrants		2,451,659			-			2,451,659
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		(112,627	)		(78,392	)		(134,457	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,386,067	)		(110,865	)		1,102,728
Net cash used in operating activities		(4,578,584	)		(1,222,586	)		(8,251,070	)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchase of fixed assets		(6,842	)		(2,508	)		(34,488	)
Purchase of intangible assets		-			-			(1,168,093	)
Repayment of technology license liability		(1,300,000	)		-			(1,150,000	)
Cash received in merger transaction		-			-			3,721
Payments made on behalf of affiliate		-			-			(137,547	)
Loans made to stockholder								(382,900	)
Increase in note receivable - related party		-			(198,248	)		-
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,306,842	)		(200,756	)		(2,869,307	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from related parties		-			-			56,500
Repayment of net amounts due to related parties		(13,200	)		-			(46,500	)
Proceeds from note payable - related party		-			838,764			930,000
Repayment of note payable - related party		(884,764	)		-			(930,000	)
Investors' deposits		-			-			100,000
Proceeds received from issuance of common stock, net of fees of $678,986, $51,307, and $820,367, respectively		9,275,465			540,811			13,513,840
Repayment of stock subscription receivable		-			35,000			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		8,377,501			1,414,575			13,623,840

Net increase (decrease) in cash		2,492,075			(8,767	)		2,503,463
Cash, beginning of period		11,388			10,053			-

Cash, end of period	$	2,503,463		$	1,286		$	2,503,463

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest	$	28,263		$	-		$	43,027
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of stock for subscription receivable	$	-		$	-		$	25,000
Allocation of proceeds from issuance of common stock to registration payment obligation	$	360,000		$	-		$	360,000

RETROPHIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Organization and Description of Business

Retrophin, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated as Desert Gateway, Inc. (“Desert Gateway”) in the State of Oklahoma on February 8, 2008. Desert Gateway was originally a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Merchant Data Services, Inc. (“American Merchant”). In a 2008 reorganization of American Merchant, each share of outstanding common stock of American Merchant was converted into one share of Desert Gateway, while all of American Merchant’s operating assets, liabilities and tax attributes (including accumulated losses and net operating losses) carried forward to another subsidiary of American Merchant in a downstream merger with such other subsidiary. Accordingly, American Merchant is not considered a predecessor company of the Desert Gateway for accounting or legal purposes. Following the 2008 reorganization, Desert Gateway re-domiciled to Delaware. Since inception and until Desert Gateway’s merger with Retrophin, Inc., a private company (“Former Retrophin”) in December 2012 (as described below), Desert Gateway had no existing operations, and its sole purpose was to locate and consummate a merger or acquisition with a private entity.

Former Retrophin was originally organized as a Delaware limited liability company, named Retrophin, LLC, on March 11, 2011 (“Inception”). On September 20, 2012, Retrophin filed a Certificate of Conversion to change its legal form of organization from a limited liability company to a corporation in the State of Delaware. This conversion into a corporation, which preceded the Merger on December 12, 2012, resulted in no change of ownership and was therefore considered a recapitalization of the LLC’s equity.

On September 13, 2012, Former Retrophin formed a new entity, Retrophin Pharmaceutical, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retrophin, Inc.

On December 12, 2012, Desert Gateway completed the transactions contemplated under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 12, 2012 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Desert Gateway, Desert Gateway Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Desert Gateway, and Former Retrophin, our predecessor, in which Former Retrophin became a wholly-owned subsidiary and the principal operating subsidiary of the Company. The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are collectively referred to herein as the “Merger”. The Merger became effective on December 12, 2012, upon the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Accordingly, the Merger resulted in a change in control of Desert Gateway. Desert Gateway’s net assets amounted to $1,401 at the time of the merger, including $3,721 of cash and $2,320 of trade liabilities. The merger is being accounted for as a reverse merger and recapitalization of Former Retrophin into Desert Gateway, whereby Desert Gateway is the legal acquirer and Former Retrophin is the legal acquiree and the accounting acquirer in this transaction.

Upon the consummation of the Merger all of the issued and outstanding Class A Preferred shares of Former Retrophin were exchanged into the Company’s common shares at the rate of 1 to 7 (each Class A Preferred stockholder received 7 shares of the Company’s common stock) and all of the issued and outstanding share of common stock of Former Retrophin were exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock on exchange ratio of 1 to 5 (each common stockholder of Former Retrophin received 5 shares of the Company’s common stock).

The consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to these changes as if the merger occurred at the inception of the Company.

On February 14, 2013, the Company changed its name to “Retrophin, Inc.” through a short-form merger pursuant to Section 253 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, with its then wholly owned subsidiary, and our predecessor, Former Retrophin, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation following the merger.

On April 1, 2013, the Company changed its fiscal year end from the last of February to a fiscal year end of December 31 in order to confirm its reporting cycle to that of Former Retrophin.

The Company is an emerging biotechnology company dedicated to developing drugs for rare and life-threatening diseases. The Company’s primary business objective is to develop and commercialize therapies for orphan diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration. The Company is considered to be a development stage company and, as such, the Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915 “Development Stage Entities.” The Company is subject to all of the risks and uncertainties associated with development stage companies.

NOTE 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “2012 10-K/A”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 13, 2013. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, since they are interim statements, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for annual financial statements, but reflect all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, that are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The December 31, 2012 balance sheet information was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

NOTE 3. LIQUIDITY, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND MANAGEMENT PLANS

The Company incurred a net loss of approximately $38 million, including stock-based compensation charge of $25 million for the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) to March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2013, the Company had a cash balance of approximately $2.5 million and working capital of approximately $1.1 million. The Company’s accumulated deficit amounted to approximately $38,355,034 at March 31, 2013.

The Company has principally financed its operations from inception using proceeds from sales of its equity securities in a series of private placement transactions (see Note 11). The Company to date has no revenues, significantly limited capital resources and is subject to all of the risks and uncertainties that are typical of a development stage enterprise. Significant uncertainties include, among others, whether it will be able to raise the capital it needs to finance the start of its planned operations and whether such operations, if launched, will enable the Company to become a profitable enterprise.

On February 14, 2013, in connection with the closing of a private placement, we issued and sold an aggregate of 3,045,929 shares of common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $9,137,787 in cash, and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,522,969 shares of common stock (Note 11).

In the second quarter of 2013, the Company, its Chief Executive Officer and a related party became party to a series of agreements to settle up to $2,286,511 of liabilities, which Company management believes are the primary obligation of the related party. The Company and the related party have entered into indemnification agreements whereby the related party has agreed to defend and hold the Company harmless against all such obligations and amounts, whether paid or unpaid, arising from these agreements. The Company paid $593,111 of the total settlement liabilities in the second quarter of 2013 and had $1,691,400 in outstanding settlement liabilities, $1,013,900 of which is past due and $677,500 of which was due in August 2013. The counter parties to these agreements reserve the right to demand payment at any time. The Chief Executive Officer also agreed to deliver or cause to be delivered 47,128 shares of common stock in the Company to one of the counter parties as a separate component of one of the agreements. Accordingly, the Company does not believe it is required to record a liability for the shared-based component of this specific agreement during the second quarter ended June 30, 2013.

There is uncertainty as to whether the related party will have sufficient liquidity to repay the Company or fund the indemnification agreements should it become necessary.

Concurrent with the execution of such settlement agreements, the Company received promissory notes from the related party whereby the related party agreed to pay the Company the principal amount of $593,111 plus interest at an annualized rate of 5% as reimbursement of the payments that the Company made to settle a portion of the agreements.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of assets or the classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management believes the Company’s ability to continue its operations depends on its ability to raise capital. The Company entered into a licensing agreement providing it with the use of certain technology. The Company is currently developing pre-clinical and clinical studies of drug candidates. The licensing agreement (described in Note 8) also enables the Company to sell the licensed technology as a research product or sublicense the technology to other third parties as alternative sources of revenue to its own product development efforts. The Company’s future depends on the costs, timing, and outcome of regulatory reviews of its product candidates and the costs of commercialization activities, including product marketing, sales and distribution. During the first quarter of 2013, the Company raised an aggregate of approximately $9.95 million in certain private placement transactions. The Company expects to continue to finance its cash needs through additional private equity offerings and debt financings, corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements and grants from patient advocacy groups, foundations and government agencies. Although management believes that the Company has access to capital resources, there are no commitments for financing in place at this time, nor can management provide any assurance that such financing will be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all.

NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements follows:

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary in conformity with U.S. GAAP. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

The Company, while undergoing a review of its condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2013, commenced an evaluation of its accounting for a series of settlement agreements that the Company, along with certain of its related parties, entered into between April 2013 and June 2013. These agreements, which Company management originally deemed to be the primary obligation of a related party, are more fully described in Notes 3 and 13. On September 13, 2013, Company management, under the authority of the board of directors, determined that these agreements should have been disclosed in the footnotes to these condensed consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the Company has restated these condensed consolidated financial statements to include the required disclosures.

The Company also determined that its obligation to pay liquidated damages under a registration payment arrangement that it entered into in connection with a financing transaction it completed on February 14, 2013, which required the Company to cause a registration statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission by May 15, 2013, should have been recorded as a liability at the date in which this financing transaction was completed. Accordingly, the Company is correcting this error by restating these condensed consolidated financial statements to allocate approximately $360,000 of the proceeds received in this financing transaction to a registration payment obligation that was deemed probable at the date that the financing transaction was completed.

The following table illustrates the effects of the adjustment on the March 31, 2013 condensed consolidated balance sheet:

	March 31, 2013
	As Reported			Adjustment			As Restated
Total current liabilities	$	1,215,049		$	360,000		$	1,575,049

Total liabilities	$	8,172,313		$	360,000		$	8,532,313

Additional paid-in capital	$	35,132,143		$	(360,000	)	$	34,772,143

Stockholders' deficit	$	(3,221,672	)	$	(360,000	)	$	(3,581,672	)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers cash instruments with maturities of less than three months when purchased to be cash equivalents. There are no cash equivalents as of the balance sheet date.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided for using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. At March 31, 2013 and 2012, property and equipment consisted of computers with an estimated useful life of three years and leasehold improvements with an estimated life of four years.

Employee Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 addresses all forms of share-based payment (“SBP”) awards including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans and stock incentive shares. Under ASC 718 awards result in a cost that is measured at fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest and will result in a charge to operations.

Non-Employee Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“ASC 505”), Share Based Payments to Non-Employees, and ASC 718 which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges are being amortized over their respective contractual vesting periods.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Due to inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in these estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include valuing equity securities in share-based payments, estimating fair value of equity instruments recorded as derivative liabilities, estimating the useful lives of depreciable and amortizable assets and estimating the fair value of long-lived assets to assets whether impairment charges may apply.

Research and Development Costs:

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred and consist primarily of consulting costs, contract research and development costs, and compensation costs. For the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013, the Company recognized $108,735, $34,271, and $1,003,248, respectively, of research and development costs.

Patents

The Company capitalized external cost, such as filing fees and associated attorney fees, incurred to obtain issued patents and patent applications pending. The Company expense cost associated with maintaining and defending patents subsequent to their issuance in the period incurred. The Company amortizes patent cost once issued on a straight-line basis over the estimate useful lives of the patents. The Company assess the potential impairment to all capitalized patent cost when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of our patent may not be recoverable.

Basic and diluted Net Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share has been computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. All potentially dilutive common shares have been excluded since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

An aggregate of 1,597,969 and 0 warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 because to do so would have an anti-dilutive effect for the periods presented.

An aggregate of 140,673 and 2,218,705 common stock equivalents (incentive shares) were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, because they were contingent shares subject to recall.

Derivative Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then revalued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company calculates the fair value of the financial instruments using a probability-weighted Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is comparable to the Binomial Lattice options pricing model at inception and on each subsequent valuation date. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. (See Note 5 and Note 6).

Financial Instruments and Fair Value

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” (“ASC Topic 820”) establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 are described below:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3 – Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

In estimating the fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities, the Company used a probability-weighted Black-Scholes option pricing model. (See Note 5 and Note 6).

Financial assets with carrying values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents as well as prepaid expenses and other current assets. Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.

Registration Payment Arrangement

The Company accounted for registration rights agreements in accordance with ASC 825-20, “Registration Payment Arrangements.” ASC 825-20 addresses an issuer's accounting for registration payment arrangements. This pronouncement specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument, should be separately recognized and accounted for as a contingency in accordance with ASC 450-20 “Loss Contingencies”.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 855-10, “Subsequent Events,” relating to subsequent events. This guidance establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. This guidance defines the period after the balance sheet date during which events or transactions that may occur would be required to be disclosed in a company’s financial statements. The Company has evaluated subsequent events up to the date of issuance of this report.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated (“ASU”) 2013-04 “Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Amount at the Reporting Date is Fixed”) ("ASU 2013-04"). The guidance in this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 with early adoption permitted. The guidance in this update requires companies to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements as the sum of the amount the entity has (a) contractually agreed to pay, and (b) any additional amounts that the entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The Company early adopted this guidance in the second quarter of 2013 (Note 13).

Excepted as noted above, management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a significant effect on the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In accordance with ASC Topic 815-40, “Derivative and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (“ASC Topic 815-40”), instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be derivative instruments. Based upon the Company’s analysis of the criteria contained in ASC Topic 815-40, the warrants issued in connection with the sale of the common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 that do not have fixed settlement provisions, are not indexed to Company’s own stock. The fair value of the warrants are classified as derivative liabilities due to a ratchet provision that allows for a favorable adjustment to the exercise price if the Company issues additional equity instruments in the future at an effective price per share less than the exercise price then in effect.

The warrants are re-measured at each balance sheet date based on estimated fair value. Changes in estimated fair value are recorded as non-cash valuation adjustments within other income (expense) in the Company’s results of operations. The Company recorded a loss on a change in the estimated fair value of warrants of $2,451,659 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

The Company calculated the fair value of the warrants using a probability-weighted Black-Scholes option pricing model which is comparable to the Binomial Lattice pricing model. The assumptions used at the date of issuance and at March 31, 2013 are noted in the following table:

	As of
	Date of issuance February 14, 2013	March 31, 2013
Fair market price of common stock	$3.75	$5.50
Expected option term	5 years	4.88 years
Risk-free interest rate	0.86%	0.77%
Expected volatility	101%	101%

Expected volatility is based on historical stock volatilities of several comparable publicly-traded companies over a period equal to the expected terms of the warrants, as the Company does not have a long trading history estimate the volatility of its own common stock. The warrants have a transferability provision. Based on the guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) for options issued with such a provision, the Company used the full contractual term as the initial expected term of the warrants. The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury security rates for the remaining term of the warrants at the measurement date.

NOTE 6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table presents the Company’s liability that is measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2013:

			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2013
	Total carrying value at March 31, 2013		Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

Derivative liabilities related to warrants	$	6,957,264	$	-	$	-	$	6,957,264

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liability for the three months ended March 31, 2013:

	Fair Value Measurements of Common Stock Warrants Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	-
Issuance of common stock warrants		4,505,605
Change in fair value of common stock warrant liability		2,451,659
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	6,957,264

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At each reporting period, the Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are subject to ASC Topic 820. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs or instruments which trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are classified as Level 3.

NOTE 7. ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consist of the following at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Compensation related costs	$	388,465	$	1,022,716
Consulting fees		331,865		679,800
Legal fees		-		563,380
Finders’ fee liability		-		100,000
Interest		-		90,650
Other		-		11,250
	$	720,330	$	2,467,796

NOTE 8. LICENSE AGREEMENT

On February 16, 2012 the Company entered into an agreement pursuant to which a biotech company (the “Sublicensor”) with license rights to certain drug technologies agreed to grant us a worldwide sublicense for the development, manufacture and commercialization of RE-021 (DARA). The licensing agreement also enables the Company to sell the licensed technology as a research product or sublicense the technology to other third parties as potential sources of revenue. Under the license agreement, Sublicensor is obligated to transfer to the Company certain information, records, regulatory filings, materials and inventory controlled by Sublicensor and relating to or useful for developing RE-021. The Company must use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize RE-021 in specified major market countries and other countries in which the Company believes it is commercially reasonable to develop and commercialize such products. The agreement shall continue until neither party has any obligations under the agreement to make payments to the other party.

In accordance with the agreement as amended most recently as of January 7, 2013, the Company made two non-refundable payments totaling $2,450,000, the first payment of $1,150,000 made upon execution and the second payment of $1,400,000 made in February 2013, which includes a $250,000 fee payable to the sublicensee in exchange for extended due date of this payment from October 1, 2012 to February 2013. As of March 31, 2013, the Company has recognized $2,300,000 for the cost of the License Agreement which is presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as an intangible asset that is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the License Agreement which expires on September 30, 2023. The $250,000 of extension fees were expensed to operations in February 2013. In addition, the Company issued 620,000 common shares to Ligand valued at $1,550,000 as a result of the merger transaction. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized amortization expense of the license related to this agreement of $49,955 and $0, respectively.

NOTE 9. NOTES PAYABLE

Note Payable - related party

On February 1, 2012, the Company entered into a secured promissory note with a related party in the amount of $900,000, with an interest rate of 12% per annum, compounded monthly. The remaining $884,764 principal balance of this note and accrued interest of $90,650 was repaid during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Total interest expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013 were aggregated to $19,733, $17,327 and $147,480, respectively.

NOTE 10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On December 8, 2011, the Company received advances of funds aggregating $8,500 from entities related through common ownership. Such advances were repaid during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

In August 2012, the Company paid a security deposit on behalf of an affiliate of $137,547 in connection with a building lease entered into by such affiliate. The Company assumed the lease from its affiliate in April 2013, whereby the security deposit was assigned to the Company.

Subsequent to March 31, 2013, the Company became a party to certain settlement agreements, which management believes are the primary obligation of an affiliate (Note 13).

NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Issuances

Common Stock

In January 2013, the Company sold an aggregate of 272,221 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $3.00 per share in certain private placement transactions, for an aggregate purchase price of $816,664 in cash. The issuance of such shares of common stock was not registered under the Securities Act as such issuance was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

On February 14, 2013, the Company closed a private placement (the “Private Placement”) of 3,045,929 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $3.00 per share, or $9,137,787 in the aggregate, and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,597,969 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $3.60 per such share underlying any Warrant. The Warrants are deemed to be derivative instruments due to a ratchet provision that adjusts the exercise price if the Company issues additional equity instruments in the future at an effective price per share less than the exercise price then in effect. Upon issuance, the Company recorded $4,505,605 to additional paid in capital in relation to the Warrants.

The Company concurrently entered into a registration payment arrangement requiring it to file a Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days of the closing date of this transaction and cause it be declared effective by no later than 90 days of the closing date of this transaction. The registration payment arrangement provided for the Company to pay liquidated damages in the amount of 2% of the proceeds received in this transaction per month for each month that the Company is not in compliance with this requirement, not to exceed 10% in the aggregate. The Company determined that it was probable that it would not be in a position to comply with these requirements and therefore allocated approximately $360,000 of the proceeds received in this transaction to a registration payment obligation.

Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company has agreed to file a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) with the SEC within 30 days of the date of the Registration Rights Agreement registering the total number of shares of common stock purchased in the Private Placement and shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants. The Company has agreed to use its reasonable efforts to have the Registration Statement declared effective within 60 days after the date of the Registration Rights Agreement (or, in the event of a “full review” by the SEC, within 90 days after the date of the Registration Rights Agreement). The Company has also agreed to use reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement until all of the securities covered by the Registration Statement have or may be sold by investors under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions.

The Registration Rights Agreement provides that in the event the Registration Statement has not been filed or declared effective within the prescribed time period or if the Company has failed to maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement as required for specified time periods, the Company shall pay to the holders of registrable securities, on the date of each such event and on each monthly anniversary thereof until the applicable event is cured, partial liquidated damages equal to 2.0% of the aggregate purchase price paid by such Purchaser in the Private Placement, up to a maximum of 10.0% of such aggregate purchase price. If the Company fails to pay any partial liquidated damages pursuant to this Section in full within seven days after the date payable, the Company will pay interest thereon at a rate of 18% per annum (or such lesser maximum amount that is permitted to be paid by applicable law) to the Purchaser, accruing daily from the date such partial liquidated damages are due until such amounts, plus all such interest thereon, are paid in full.

The foregoing description of the Registration Rights Agreement does not purport to describe all of the terms and provisions thereof and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Registration Rights Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 19, 2013 and is incorporated herein by reference.

NOTE 12. INCENTIVE SHARES

At March 31, 2013, the Company did not have any active share-based compensation plans available for grants to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. Since its inception, the Company has granted incentive shares.

For the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the period from March 11, 2011 (inception) through March 31, 2013, the Company recognized $159,205, $2,538,391, and $24,548,726 as compensation expense related to incentive shares granted in the consolidated statements of operations, respectively. Share compensation for non-employee awards subject to vesting is being accrued at current fair value. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there was approximately $522,023 and $844,973, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to incentive shares issued. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted average of 1.52 years.

	Employee - number of shares			Non Employee - number of shares			Total number of shares			Weighted Average Fair Value

Unvested December 31, 2011		1,281,225			321,165			1,602,390		$	4.00
Granted		866,180			87,503			953,683			12.89
Vested		(2,048,280	)		(193,672	)		(2,241,952	)		7.34
Forfeited		(46,353	)		-			(46,353	) )		9.06
Unvested December 31, 2012		52,772			214,996			267,768			5.79
Granted		-			12,500			12,500			4.20
Vested		(5,556	)		(41,124	)		(46,680	)		3.41
Forfeited		(20,833	)		(72,082	)		(92,915	)		4.00
Unvested March 31, 2013		26,383			114,290			140,673		$	3.12

All of the Company’s share base payments were originally issued as Retrophin LLC Class B incentive units that represent a profits interest up through the date of Retrophin LLC’s conversation to a C Corporation, which was structured as a tax free exchange transaction.

Shares granted as incentive shares were originally subject to certain conditions at the time of grant. Such conditions specified that the occurrence of a Termination Event, as defined in the amended operating agreement the Company shall have the right, but not the obligation, to repurchase, all, of the vested incentive shares owned by such incentive shareholder, at a purchase price based on the fair market value of the incentive shares determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. The aforementioned repurchase option was rescinded upon the Company’s conversion to a corporation.

NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Operating Lease Agreements

In October 2012, the Company entered into a sublease with a company (“Sublessor”) affiliated by common ownership that expires on November 29, 2016. The sublease agreement required the Company to pay 50% of the rent and related escalations and for the Company to pay for 50% of the utilities incurred by the Sublessor.

On April 11, 2013, the lease was assigned to the Company by the Sublessor inclusive of a $137,547 security deposit held. Unless sooner terminated, the Company will incur annualized rent expense of approximately $283,000 through the term of the lease.

Employment Agreements

Effective May 13, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Horacio Plotkin, M.D. (the “Plotkin Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Dr. Plotkin was appointed as Chief Medical Officer of the Company.

In accordance with the terms of the Plotkin Employment Agreement, Dr. Plotkin’s initial base salary is $350,000 and he is eligible to receive a discretionary annual bonus of up to 50% of his then applicable base salary. Additionally, Dr. Plotkin received $20,000 in connection with signing the Plotkin Employment Agreement. Dr. Plotkin will also be awarded options to purchase 120,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $8.70 per share, a pro rata portion of which will vest quarterly during the 3 years following the effective date.

Effective May 20, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Marc L. Panoff (the “Panoff Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Panoff was appointed as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company.

In accordance with the terms of the Panoff Employment Agreement, Mr. Panoff’s initial base salary is $230,000 and he is eligible to receive a discretionary annual bonus of up to 50% of his then applicable base salary. Mr. Panoff will also be granted 120,000 units of restricted common stock of the Company, a pro rata portion of which will vest quarterly beginning on December 31, 2013 during the 3 years following the effective date.

Liquidated Damages under Registration Rights Agreement

The Company was required to have the Registration Statement on Form S-1 declared effective within 90 days after the offering closed. The closing date of the offering was February 14, 2013; therefore the 90th day was May 15, 2013. As of the date of this filing, the Registration Statement on form S-1 has not been declared effective. The Company has evaluated the provisions of the Registration Rights Agreement and is obligated to pay liquidated damages beginning in the second quarter of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

Settlement Agreements

In the second quarter of 2013, the Company, its Chief Executive Officer and a related party became party to a series of agreements to settle up to $2,286,511 of liabilities, which Company management believes are the primary obligation of the related party. The Company and the related party have entered into indemnification agreements whereby the related party has agreed to defend and hold the Company harmless against all such obligations and amounts, whether paid or unpaid, arising from these agreements. Notwithstanding the indemnification, the Company recorded a $2,286,511 charge to operations during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that was offset by a corresponding liability of $1,691,400 for the difference between (a) the aggregate amount of all such settlements, and (b) $593,111 of cash and non-cash consideration that the Company paid to immediately settle a portion of the agreement on behalf of the related party. The $1,691,400 settlement liability, $1,013,900 of which is past due and $677,500 of which was due in August 2013. The counter parties to these agreements reserve the right to demand payment at any time. The Chief Executive Officer also agreed to deliver or cause to be delivered 47,128 shares of common stock in the Company to one of the counter parties as a separate component of one of the agreements. Accordingly, the Company does not believe it is required to record a liability for the shared-based component of this specific agreement during the second quarter ended June 30, 2013.

There is uncertainty as to whether the related party will have sufficient liquidity to repay the Company or fund the indemnification agreements should it become necessary.

The Company applied the accounting guidance provided in ASU 2013-04. The guidance in this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 with early adoption permitted. The guidance in this update requires companies to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements as the sum of the amount that the entity has (a) contractually agreed to pay, and (b) any additional amounts that the entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The Company has recorded the full amount of the settlements as a charge to its operations due to uncertainty as to whether the related party will have sufficient liquidity to repay the Company or fund the indemnification agreements should it become necessary. Any amounts that the Company may recover under the note due from the related party or under the terms of the indemnification agreement, if in fact any amounts are recovered at all, would be characterized as a capital contribution at the date such payments are received.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant factors affecting our financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated. The discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes presented herein. In addition to historical information, the following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ significantly from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors discussed in this Form 10-Q.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Retrophin, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“we”, “us”, the “Company” or “Retrophin”) include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements herein which are not historical reflect our current expectations and projections about the Company’s future results, performance, liquidity, financial condition, prospects and opportunities and are based upon information currently available to the Company and our management and their interpretation of what is believed to be significant factors affecting the businesses, including many assumptions regarding future events. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things:

·	our ability to produce, market and generate sales of our products;

·	our ability to develop, acquire and/or introduce new products;

·	our projected future sales, profitability and other financial metrics;

·	our future financing plans;

·	our plans for expansion of our facilities;

·	our anticipated needs for working capital;

·	the anticipated trends in our industry;

·	our ability to expand our sales and marketing capability;

·	acquisitions of other companies or assets that we might undertake in the future;

·	our operations in the United States and abroad, and the domestic and foreign regulatory, economic and political conditions; and

·	competition existing today or that will likely arise in the future.

Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “seek,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. Actual results, performance, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, prospects and opportunities could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements as a result of various risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the ability to raise sufficient capital to continue the Company’s operations. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” on our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on June 13, 2013 and matters described in this Form 10-Q generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q will in fact occur. Potential investors should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, there is no undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason.

The specific discussions in this Form 10-Q about the Company include financial projections and future estimates and expectations about the Company’s business. The projections, estimates and expectations are presented in this Form 10-Q only as a guide about future possibilities and do not represent actual amounts or assured events. All the projections and estimates are based exclusively on the Company management’s own assessment of our business, the industry in which it works and the economy at large and other operational factors, including capital resources and liquidity, financial condition, fulfillment of contracts and opportunities. The actual results may differ significantly from the projections.

Potential investors should not make an investment decision based solely on the Company’s projections, estimates or expectations.

Overview

Our results of operations discussed below reflect our operations during the period in which we are in development stage and starting up our operations. As a result, these results should not be considered indicative of our anticipated results of operations on a going forward basis.

Business

We were organized as Desert Gateway, Inc. (“Desert Gateway”), a corporation whose sole purpose was to locate and consummate a merger or acquisition with a private entity and, prior to the merger described below, had no existing operations.

On February 14, 2013, we changed our name to “Retrophin, Inc.” through a short-form merger pursuant to Section 253 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, with its then wholly owned subsidiary, and our predecessor, former Retrophin, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation following the merger. On April 1, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company determined to change the Company’s fiscal year from a fiscal year ending in February of each year to a fiscal year ending on December 31 of each year.

We are a development stage company focused on developing pharmaceutical products primarily for the treatment of rare diseases. Our lead product in development, RE-021, a small molecule intended to treat focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, has completed Phase 2 clinical studies demonstrating safety and efficacy, and we expect to initiate a Phase 2 clinical study in 2013. We also have a number of programs in preclinical development. Our second most developed program (RE-024) for the treatment of pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration is in preclinical testing, and we will seek to initiate clinical trials of this product candidate as soon as is practical. We are also developing a treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Our focus is to seek treatment for serious, unmet, rare diseases. The diseases on which we focus are considered “orphan” diseases because they affect fewer than 200,000 patients in the United States. However, such diseases have a profound impact on those that suffer from them and on their families. Currently, we believe that we are the only company that is focusing on developing treatments for these rare and ultra-rare diseases.

Plan of Operation

Our plan of operation for the years ending December 31, 2013 and 2014 is to continue implementing our business strategy, includingthe clinical development of our three drug candidates, focusing primarily on the development of RE-021 for the treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). We also intend to expand our drug product portfolio by acquiring additional drugs for marketing or development. We expect our principal expenditures during the next 12 months to include:

·	operating expenses, including expanded research and development and general and administrative expenses; and

·	product development expenses, including the costs incurred with respect to applications to conduct clinical trials in the United States for our three products and the costs of ongoing and planned clinical trials.

As part of our planned expansion, we anticipate hiring additional full-time employees for research and development activities and for general and administrative activities. In addition, we intend to use clinical research organizations and third parties to perform our clinical studies and manufacturing. At our current and desired pace of commercialization and clinical development of our drugs, for the next 12 months, we expect to spend approximately $7 to $8 million on clinical development and research and development activities and approximately $5 to $6 million on general and administrative expenses. We cannot assure you these amounts will be sufficient to fund our operations over the course of the next two years and we may need to expend significantly greater amounts to accomplish our goals.

Research and Development Projects

RE-021. We plan to initiate a Phase 2 clinical trial of RE-021 in patients with FSGS in 2013, with reduction in proteinuria as the primary endpoint. We expect it will take at least three years to complete development and obtain FDA approval of RE-021 for any indication, and we may never obtain such approval. Currently, we anticipate that we will need to expend approximately an additional $4 to $5 million in development costs over the next 12 months and at least an aggregate of approximately $25 to $35 million before we receive FDA approval for RE-021 for treatment of patients with FSGS.

RE-024. We intend to develop RE-024 as a potential treatment for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN). RE-024 is a preclinical investigational program. In vivo animal testing of these molecules is underway, and we plan to file the Investigational New Drug Application (the “IND”) for RE-024 by 2014. We expect that it will take an additional five to seven years to complete development and obtain FDA approval of RE-024, if ever. Currently, we anticipate that we will need to expend approximately an additional $1 to $2 million in development costs over the next 12 months and at least an aggregate of approximately $30 to $50 million until we receive FDA approval for RE-024 should we choose to continue development.

RE-001. RE-001 is a recombinant, modified form of utrophin, a protein similar to the dystrophin protein that is missing in the muscles of DMD patients. RE-001 is a preclinical investigational program. Production scale-up the molecule is underway, and we expect that in vivo evaluation of clinical trial quality material may begin in 2013. Currently, we anticipate that we will need to expend approximately an additional $3 million in development costs over the next 12 months.

Results of Operations for the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2013 compared to the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2012

Operating Expenses

We had no revenues during the three month period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Our operating expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 were $2,250,484 compared to $3,558,454 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. Our operating expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 consisted of (i) compensation and related costs of approximately $1,045,287 which included (a) approximately $1,024,454 in salaries, bonuses and benefits to Company executives and employees and (b) approximately 5,556 shares of vested incentive shares granted to members and employees amounting to approximately $20,833, (ii) professional fees of approximately $692,577 which included (a) approximately 42,374 shares of vested incentive shares granted to consultants and direct transfers of shares to consultants by members amounting to approximately $138,372 for services rendered; (b) research and development fees of approximately $108,735 related to Retrophin's drug (RE-021 and RE-024) candidates for the treatment of FSGS and PKAN and evaluation of potential new technologies; (c) legal expense of approximately $138,243 related to licensing and production acquisition, employment and consulting agreements and general corporate work; (d) consulting fees of approximately $97,893 related to outsourcing management roles; (e) accounting fees of approximately $125,254 related to general accounting and audit work and (f) $84,075 in fees related to public and investor relations, (iii) rent expense of approximately $35,112, (iv) license fees of approximately $100,000, (v) depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $52,168 related to the Ligand licensing agreement and (vi) the remaining balance of $325,340 is related to travel and entertainment, business developments, advertising and other operating expenses.

Other Income (Expense)

Other operating expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 were as follows: (i) approximately $784, which is related to income from foreign exchange in a vendor payment, (ii) approximately 2,451,659, which is related to a loss on the change in fair value of common stock warrant liability and (iii) approximately $19,733, which is related to interest expense on a $900,000 note which was repaid during the three month period ended March 31, 2013, and a $21,830 write off of interest receivable.

Operating Loss

For the three month period ended March 31, 2013, our net loss from operation was approximately $2,250,484, compared to a net loss from operation of approximately $3,558,454 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management believes that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. Therefore we will either need additional equity or debt financing, or by entering into strategic alliances on products in development to sustain our operations until we can achieve profitability and positive cash flows from operating activities, if ever.

Our continued operations will depend on whether we can successfully raise additional funds through equity and/or debt financing. Such additional funds may not become available on acceptable terms, if at all, and we cannot assure you that any additional funding we do obtain will be sufficient to meet our needs in the long term. Through March 31, 2013, we had raised approximately $13.5 million through capital contributions and notes payable from Retrophin shareholders and related parties.

In January 2013, we sold an aggregate of 272,221 shares of common stock at $3.00 per share in certain private placement transactions, for an aggregate purchase price of $816,664 in cash.

On February 14, 2013, in connection with the closing of a private placement, we issued and sold an aggregate of 3,045,929 shares of common stock at $3.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $9,137,787 in cash, and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,597,969 shares of common stock.

The Company concurrently entered into a registration payment arrangement requiring it to file a Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days of the closing date of this transaction and cause it to be declared effective by no later than 90 days of the closing date of this transaction. The registration payment arrangement provided for the Company to pay liquidated damages in the amount of 2% of the proceeds received in this transaction per month for each month that the Company is not in compliance with this requirement, not to exceed 10% in the aggregate. The Company determined that it was probable that it would not be in a position to comply with these requirements and therefore allocated approximately $360,000 of the proceeds received in this transaction to a registration payment obligation.

Since our inception in 2011, we have generated losses from operations and we anticipate that we will continue to generate losses from operations for the foreseeable future. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, our stockholders’ deficit was $3,581,672 and $3,407,815, respectively. Our net loss from operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 was $2,250,484 compared to $3,558,454 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. Net cash used in operating activities was $4,578,584 for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 compared to $1,222,586 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. Operations since inception have been funded entirely with the proceeds from equity and debt financings. As of March 31, 2013, we had cash equivalents of $2,503,463. We anticipate that our existing capital resources will not be sufficient for us to continue operations beyond September 2013 without additional funding. We will continue to fund operations from cash on hand and through the similar sources of capital previously described. We can give no assurance that such capital will be available to us on favorable terms or at all. If we are unable to raise additional funds in the future on acceptable terms, or at all, we may be forced to curtail our desired development. In addition we could be forced to delay or discontinue product development, and forego attractive business opportunities. Any additional sources of financing will likely involve the sale of our equity securities, which will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders.

In the second quarter of 2013, the Company, its Chief Executive Officer and a related party became party to a series of agreements to settle up to $2,286,511 of liabilities, which Company management believes are the primary obligation of the related party. The Company and the related party have entered into indemnification agreements whereby the related party has agreed to defend and hold the Company harmless against all such obligations and amounts, whether paid or unpaid, arising from these agreements. The Company paid $593,111 of the total settlement liabilities in the second quarter of 2013 and had $1,691,400 in outstanding settlement liabilities, $1,013,900 of which is past due and $677,500 of which was due in August 2013. The counter parties to these agreements reserve the right to demand payment at any time. The Chief Executive Officer also agreed to deliver or cause to be delivered 47,128 shares of common stock in the Company to one of the counter parties as a separate component of one of the agreements. There is uncertainty as to whether the related party will have sufficient liquidity to repay the Company or fund the indemnification agreements should it become necessary.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Operating activities used approximately $4,578,584 of cash during the three month period ended March 31, 2013 compared $1,222,586 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. The increase of $3,355,998 was the result of an increase in net loss of $1,170,889, a decrease in non-cash charges of $124,328 and a net change in operating assets and liabilities of $2,498,694.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 was $1,306,842, compared to $200,756 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. The increase of $1,106,086 was primarily the result of a decrease in a related party note receivable in the amount of $198,248 and repayment of technology lease liability in the amount of $1,300,000.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

For three month period ended March 31, 2013, cash provided by financing activities was $8,377,501, compared to $1,414,575 during the three month period ended March 31, 2012. The increase of $6,962,926 was primarily a result of an increase of $8,734,654 in proceeds received from the private sale of our equity securities, offset by a decrease in activities associated with related party notes payable of $1,723,528.

In January 2013, we sold an aggregate of 272,221 shares of common stock at $3.00 per share in certain private placement transactions, for an aggregate purchase price of $816,664 in cash. The issuance of such shares of common stock was not registered under the Securities Act as such issuance was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

On February 14, 2013, we closed a private placement of 3,045,929 shares of our common stock, at a purchase price of $3.00 per share, or $9,137,787 in the aggregate, and Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,597,969 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $3.60 per such share underlying any warrant. The issuance of the shares of common stock in such private placement was not registered under the Securities Act as such issuance was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

The Company concurrently entered into a registration rights agreement requiring it to file a registration statement on Form S-1 within 30 days of the closing date of the transaction and cause such registration statement to be declared effective within 60 days thereafter. The registration rights agreement provides for the payment of certain liquidated damages at the rate of 2% of the gross proceeds per month for eachin which the Company is not in compliance with the agreement, not exceeding 10% of gross proceeds in the aggregate.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and reported amounts of expenses for the periods presented. Judgments must also be made about the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. We believe the following discussion addresses the accounting policies that are necessary to understand and evaluate our reported financial results.

Share-Based Payments

We adopted authoritative accounting guidance which establishes standards for share-based transactions in which we receive consultants or employee's services in exchange for equity instruments, such as stock incentive awards. These authoritative accounting standards require that we expense the fair value of stock awards, as measured on the awards' grant date.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of the relevant accounting guidance in future periods, the compensation expense that we record may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period. There is a high degree of subjectivity involved when using fair value to estimate share-based compensation. Consequently, there is a risk that our estimates of the fair values of our share-based compensation awards on the grant dates may bear little resemblance to the actual values realized upon the vesting, expiration, early termination or forfeiture of those share-based payments. Stock incentive awards options may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero value as compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly in excess of the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements.

Income Taxes

We follow FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The standard addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FASB ASC 740, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FASB ASC 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. At the date of adoption, and as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the Company does not have a liability for unrecognized tax uncertainties.

Our policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. As of and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, we had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

Net loss per share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented as required by FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share.

Registration Payment Arrangement

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated (“ASU”) 2013-04 “Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Amount at the Reporting Date is Fixed”). The guidance in this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 with early adoption permitted. The guidance in this update requires companies to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements as the sum of the amount the entity has (a) contractually agreed to pay, and (b) any additional amounts that the entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The Company early adopted this guidance in the second quarter of 2013 (Note 13).

The Company has evaluated recent accounting pronouncements and except as noted above, their adoption has not had or is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operations.

Emerging Growth Company Critical Accounting Policy Disclosure

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the 2012 JOBS Act. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As an emerging growth company, we can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.

Off Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Change In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

31.1		Chief Executive Officer's Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
31.2		Chief Financial Officer's Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
32.1		Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 *
32.2		Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 *
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document **
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document **
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document **
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document **
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document **
101.PRE		Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document **

*		Filed herewith.
**		Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: September 13, 2013	RETROPHIN, INC.

	By:	/s/ Martin Shkreli
		Name: Martin Shkreli
		Title: Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ Marc Panoff
		Name: Marc Panoff
		Title: Chief Financial Officer

Unassociated Document

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I, Martin Shkreli, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Retrophin, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 13, 2013			/s/ Martin Shkreli
			Martin Shkreli Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Unassociated Document

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I, Marc Panoff, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Retrophin, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 13, 2013			/s/ Marc Panoff
			Marc Panoff Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Unassociated Document

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Retrophin, Inc. (the “Company”), for the period ending March 31, 2013 (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 13, 2013		/s/ Martin Shkreli
		Martin Shkreli Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Unassociated Document

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 13, 2013		/s/ Marc Panoff
		Marc Panoff Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)